Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2016-10-20 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 441 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel has a global score of 80.2, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 overall score. Google Pixel's body is thinner and incredibly lighter than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a bit better looking display than Google Pixel, because it has a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution, a better number of pixels per inch in the screen and a quite bigger display.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit more powerful processor than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a larger number of cores. The Google Pixel has a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a more mega pixels back camera, a bigger camera sensor taking higher quality photographs and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with more memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a much longer battery life than Google Pixel, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2770mAh.
The Google Pixel is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.