Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a score of 81, which is a little bit better than Google Pixel's 80.2 overall score. The Galaxy XCover Pro body is way newer, but noticeably heavier and somewhat thicker than Google Pixel. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has 4 more cores.
Google Pixel counts with just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a much smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with a bit higher pixels quantity in each screen inch. Galaxy XCover Pro features a bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a camera that is just as good as the Google Pixel one, because although the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a way tinier sensor, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, it also counts with a back facing camera with much more MP and a bigger camera aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a way better battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy XCover Pro, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Google Pixel, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.