Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is better than the Google Pixel, having a score of 88.5 against 80.2. Galaxy Z Flip's construction is incredibly newer and somewhat thinner, but also heavier than Google Pixel. The Galaxy Z Flip features a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel, because although it has a bit worse amount of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a much larger display.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Z Flip features a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel, because it has a higher amount of RAM and more processing cores.
The Galaxy Z Flip takes slightly better pictures and videos than Google Pixel, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor, a camera in the back with a worse 12 megapixels resolution and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better photography and videos in low-light environments.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has better battery life than Google Pixel, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 2770mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Google Pixel, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.