Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is much better than Google Pixel's 80.2 score. Although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 is notably heavier than Google Pixel, it's incredibly thinner and also noticeably newer. The Google Pixel features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a way smaller screen and a much lower 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a better processor than Google Pixel, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a bit better camera than Google Pixel, because although it has a lower (4K) video quality and a worse 12 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better photography and videos in low-light environments and a way larger camera sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a superior battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has a 62% larger battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Google Pixel, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.