Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2015-06-16 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel is a bit better than Sony Xperia Z4v, having a score of 80.2 against 78.8. Google Pixel's construction has the same thickness than Sony Xperia Z4v, but it's lighter. The Xperia Z4v counts with a more vivid screen than Google Pixel, because it has a better pixels density, a little bit bigger screen and a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution.
Xperia Z4v features a bit faster CPU than Google Pixel, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of cores and an extra GPU. The Xperia Z4v shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same video definition, the same video frame rates, the same diafragm aperture and a same size sensor, the Xperia Z4v also has a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels.
The Google Pixel features a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Xperia Z4v, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory. The Sony Xperia Z4v has just a little better battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 2770mAh.
Although Google Pixel is a better device, it costs more than the Xperia Z4v, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xperia Z4v. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Google Pixel, else you can save some money and buy the Xperia Z4v, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.