Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| 2016-10-20 | 2018-04-03 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is slightly better than the Google Pixel, with a score of 83.8 against 80.2. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's construction is newer and just a little bit thinner, but also way heavier than the Google Pixel. Google Pixel counts with just a bit better screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels number per inch of screen.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a little faster CPU than Google Pixel, because it has more RAM memory and a greater number of cores. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has a 23 percent more battery capacity. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a camera that's just as good as Google Pixel's camera, because although the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a smaller back camera sensor taking less light and washed colors, a worse 12 mega pixels resolution camera and a worse 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better images in low-light environments.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Google Pixel, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.