Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2020-07-14 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel has a score of 80.2, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro's 78.7 score. The Google Pixel is an a lot older cellphone than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, but Google was able to build it a lot lighter and a little bit thinner anyway. The Google Pixel features a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution and a way smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater pixels count per display inch.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also has 4 more cores. The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro features a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 2770mAh. The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro captures much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also has a lot more MP camera and a bigger camera aperture for better photography in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.