Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2020-09-08 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is a little bit better than the Google Pixel, getting a overall score of 81.6 against 80.2. Although the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is much newer than the Google Pixel, it is noticeably heavier and a little bit thicker. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel, because although it has a quite worse pixels density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a much larger display.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features slightly more memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a little faster processor than Google Pixel, because it has more cores and 2 GB more RAM.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC captures much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has a back-facing camera with much more MP, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a lot higher photo and video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better images and videos in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.