Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2021-04-28 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 229.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel has a global score of 80.2, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S's 78.2 global score. The Google Pixel construction is lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it is just a little thicker and was released 5 years before. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with a little better performance than Google Pixel, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a little bit better screen than Google Pixel, because although it has a little bit worse count of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bigger display. Google Pixel takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and videos and a way worse resolution back facing camera.
Google Pixel has a much better memory to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel is a better device, it is more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Google Pixel, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.