Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-10-20 | -- |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, with a general score of 80.2 against 77.1. Google Pixel is a a lot lighter but a bit thicker phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a better looking screen than Google Pixel, because it has a just a little greater number of pixels in each inch of screen, a lot better 2080 x 2400 resolution and a really larger screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Google Pixel counts with a lot better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, although it has less RAM memory and 4 lesser cpu cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a way better battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G shoots much clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also has a bigger aperture for better photos and videos in low-light situations and a camera with a way better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.