Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat |
| 2016-10-20 | 2018-02-22 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, having a overall score of 80.2 against 75.8. Despite of the fact the Google Pixel is older and a bit thicker than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, it's design is still way lighter. Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro has a bit more powerful processor than Google Pixel, because it has 4 more processing cores and 2 GB more RAM.
Google Pixel features a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the display. The Google Pixel counts with a little bit more storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro has a superior battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has a 44 percent greater battery capacity. Google Pixel takes slightly better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because it has a lot higher (4K) video resolution, a larger camera aperture to capture better photography and videos in low-light situations and a higher 12.3 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.