Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a general score of 81.1, which is a little bit better than Google Pixel's 80.2 global score. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's construction is way newer than the Google Pixel's, but it is a little bit thicker and noticeably heavier. Google Pixel has a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the display.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a bit better CPU than Google Pixel, because it has more processing cores and more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a bigger aperture to capture better photography and video in low light situations, a much more MP back camera and a much larger sensor capturing way better quality videos and photos.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a much longer battery life than Google Pixel, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also the cheapest, making this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.