Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-10-20 | 2020-02-07 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Ochre and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel is just a bit better than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro, with an 80.2 score against 76.6. Google Pixel's design is somewhat lighter than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro, but it is a little bit thicker and was released many years before. Google Pixel has a slightly better display than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a much smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a bit better display pixel density.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a way bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same internal memory, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a bit better processor than Google Pixel, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores (and faster).
ZTE Axon 10s Pro captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 2560x1440 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality, a way more MP camera and a bigger diafragm aperture for better photos and videos in poorly lited situations.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a much better battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2770mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.