Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 66.6 | 73.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-05-15 | 2018-07-13 |
| 5.89 x 2.80 x 0.30 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray and Green | Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 713.00 | $ 107.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 435 pixels per inch | 267 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.1 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 970 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2360 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP12 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has a global score of 73.1, which is slightly better than Honor 10's overall score of 66.6. Even though the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star is a better cellphone than the Honor 10, we must note that it's also somewhat heavier and thicker. Honor 10 has just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Honor 10 also has more RAM memory.
The Honor 10 counts with a much better screen than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a lot higher 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution, way more pixels per display inch and a little larger screen. Honor 10 has a slightly better storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Honor 10 counts with a bit better battery duration than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 3% bigger battery capacity. The Honor 10 counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a way higher video resolution and a back camera with a better resolution.
Galaxy J7 Star not only is the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.