Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S III
16 GB| Global Score | |
| 66.6 | 69.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 4.3, 4.1.2, 4.1.1, 4.0.4 |
| 2018-05-15 | 2012-05-03 |
| 5.89 x 2.80 x 0.30 inches | 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 4.69 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray and Green | Black, Blue, Brown, Gray, Pink, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 713.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| -- | 300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 970 chipset | Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2360 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP12 GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 6.16 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.1 | 4.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 830 hours standby time 22.5 hours talk time |
| 5.36 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S III has an overall score of 69.7, which is a bit better than Honor 10's 66.6 global score. Samsung Galaxy S III is a incredibly older and somewhat thicker cellphone than the Honor 10, but Samsung was able to make it somewhat lighter anyway. The Samsung Galaxy S III counts with a bit sharper screen than Honor 10, although it has way lesser pixels per inch in the screen, a way worse 1280 x 720 resolution and a bit smaller screen.
The Honor 10 features a lot bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S III, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Honor 10 features just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S III, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with more RAM memory and 4 more CPU cores.
Honor 10 captures better photographs and videos than Galaxy S III, because it has a much larger diafragm aperture, a way higher resolution back facing camera and a way higher video quality. The Honor 10 has a much better battery duration than Galaxy S III, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S III is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.