Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| 2019-05-21 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.54 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel is a little bit better than the Honor 20 Pro, with an 80.2 score against 73.2. The Google Pixel design is extremely lighter than the Honor 20 Pro, but it's just a little bit thicker and was released many years before. Honor 20 Pro features a little faster CPU than Google Pixel, because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores.
Honor 20 Pro and Google Pixel count with quite similar screens, because although the Google Pixel has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of screen. The Honor 20 Pro counts with a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel, because it has more internal memory.
The Honor 20 Pro counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Honor 20 Pro also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality, a much larger camera aperture and a back-facing camera with way more MP.
Honor 20 Pro has a very superior battery life than Google Pixel, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2770mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.