Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| 2019-05-21 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has a general score of 80, which is a bit better than the Honor 20 Pro's 73.2 global score. Even though Google Pixel 3 and Honor 20 Pro were only released with a couple of months difference, Google Pixel 3 is lighter and just a little bit thinner. Google Pixel 3 has a slightly better looking display than Honor 20 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little worse 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a bit better quantity of pixels in each inch in the display.
The Honor 20 Pro has a bit more powerful processor than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have 8 cores, the Honor 20 Pro also has more RAM. The Honor 20 Pro takes better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Honor 20 Pro also has a way bigger sensor which offers a way better image and video quality, a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a much larger aperture to take better images in poorly lited environments.
The Honor 20 Pro features a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 192 GB more internal memory. Honor 20 Pro features a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.