Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| 2019-05-21 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL is much better than Honor 20 Pro, getting a global score of 80.7 against 73.2. Google Pixel 3 XL's construction is just a bit heavier but a little thinner than the Honor 20 Pro, and they were released only 7 months apart. Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a little bit better looking screen than Honor 20 Pro, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Google Pixel 3 XL also has a better 1440 x 2960 resolution and a higher pixel quantity in each display inch.
The Honor 20 Pro has just a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor 20 Pro also has more RAM memory. The Honor 20 Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Honor 20 Pro also has a much bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photos in low-light environments, a lot higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a lot bigger camera sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality.
Honor 20 Pro features much more storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Honor 20 Pro counts with a little better battery duration than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 17 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.