Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-21 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a is a little bit better than the Honor 20 Pro, with a global score of 78.8 against 73.2. The Google Pixel 3a construction is a bit thinner and lighter than Honor 20 Pro, even though both were released only 0 months apart. Honor 20 Pro features a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Honor 20 Pro also has more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 3a has a screen that's just as good as the Honor 20 Pro one, because although the Google Pixel 3a has a bit worse 1080 x 2220 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen. The Honor 20 Pro counts with much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Honor 20 Pro has superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The Honor 20 Pro shoots better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Honor 20 Pro also has a much larger aperture, a much bigger sensor taking much higher quality videos and photos and a lot higher 48 MP resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.