Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-21 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a XL has a score of 78.9, which is a little bit better than the Honor 20 Pro's global score of 73.2. Google Pixel 3a XL is a just a little lighter and a bit thinner device than the Honor 20 Pro, even when they were only released with a few months difference. Honor 20 Pro features a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a little bit higher quantity of pixels per display inch, a bit larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340.
The Honor 20 Pro features a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 192 GB more internal storage. The Honor 20 Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Honor 20 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Honor 20 Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Honor 20 Pro also has a way more mega pixels back-facing camera, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photos and a lot larger diafragm aperture to take better images and video in low-light situations.
Honor 20 Pro features a bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.