Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| 2019-05-21 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a general score of 81.9, which is much better than Honor 20 Pro's overall score of 73.2. Although the Google Pixel 4 and Honor 20 Pro were released with only 5 months difference, the Google Pixel 4 is lighter and a little bit thinner. Google Pixel 4 counts with a slightly better screen than Honor 20 Pro, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 and a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit better pixel count in each screen inch.
Honor 20 Pro has a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 4 features a bit better CPU than Honor 20 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Honor 20 Pro features a superior battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Honor 20 Pro shoots much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Honor 20 Pro also has a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution, a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos and videos in poorly lited environments and a lot bigger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.