Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-21 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is much better than Honor 20 Pro, getting a score of 82.9 against 73.2. Google Pixel 4a is a newer cellphone, and it's also a little bit thinner and extremely lighter than Honor 20 Pro. The Google Pixel 4a has just a bit better looking display than Honor 20 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Google Pixel 4a also counts with a little greater pixel count in each display inch.
The Honor 20 Pro counts with a much better memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. Honor 20 Pro counts with a bit better processor than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Honor 20 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Honor 20 Pro features a much better camera than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Honor 20 Pro also has a lot bigger camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos, a larger camera aperture to take better captures and video in low-light situations and a back facing camera with a way higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
Honor 20 Pro features better battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 27 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.