Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-21 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is much better than the Honor 20 Pro, getting an 87.5 score against 73.2. Google Pixel 4a 5G is a newer cellphone, and it's also just a bit thinner and just a little lighter than Honor 20 Pro. The Honor 20 Pro and the Google Pixel 4a 5G both feature very similar screens, because although the Google Pixel 4a 5G has a little smaller display, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a quite better pixel amount in each inch in the display.
Honor 20 Pro has a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Honor 20 Pro counts with a bit superior processing unit than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Honor 20 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Honor 20 Pro shoots better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Honor 20 Pro also counts with a larger aperture to take better low-light photography and videos, a camera with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution and a way larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The Honor 20 Pro features a bit better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 3 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.