Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| -- | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-05-21 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 409 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 is just a bit better than Honor 20 Pro, with a 77.7 score against 73.2. Even though HTC One M9 is incredibly older and thicker than Honor 20 Pro, it's design is still lighter. The HTC One M9 features a better looking display than Honor 20 Pro, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels count in each screen inch.
HTC One M9 has just a bit better processing power than Honor 20 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have 8 processing cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an additional graphics co-processor and a 64-bits processor. Honor 20 Pro shoots much clearer videos and photos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Honor 20 Pro also has a larger sensor providing a higher image quality, a way larger aperture and a way higher 48 megapixels resolution camera.
Honor 20 Pro counts with a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Honor 20 Pro has a way better battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.