Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| 2019-05-21 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black and Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 409 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.54 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U Ultra is a bit better than Honor 20 Pro, getting a general score of 77 against 73.2. Although the HTC U Ultra is incredibly older than Honor 20 Pro, it's construction is just a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner. The Honor 20 Pro features just a bit better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores (and faster).
HTC U Ultra has a bit more vivid screen than Honor 20 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560px resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen. HTC U Ultra counts with more storage for apps and games than Honor 20 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Honor 20 Pro features greater battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. Honor 20 Pro takes better videos and photos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Honor 20 Pro also has a back camera with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution, a bigger camera sensor taking higher quality videos and pictures and a much bigger camera aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.