Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-21 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has a general score of 85.4, which is better than Honor 20 Pro's global score of 73.2. LG K92 is a heavier cellphone than Honor 20 Pro, but they are 0.33inches thick. The Honor 20 Pro has a little bit better screen than LG K92, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bit greater quantity of pixels per display inch.
The LG K92 counts with a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Honor 20 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Honor 20 Pro counts with a little bit better performance than LG K92, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor 20 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
LG K92 captures slightly better videos and photos than Honor 20 Pro, because although it has a lot tinier camera aperture which is worse for capturing photos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same back camera sensor size, the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the LG K92 also counts with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
LG K92's battery lifetime is very similar to the Honor 20 Pro one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.