Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-21 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Glacier and Obsidian |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is better than Honor 20 Pro, with a score of 85.3 against 73.2. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 body is extremely newer and noticeably thinner, but a lot heavier than Honor 20 Pro. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features just a bit better looking display than Honor 20 Pro, because although it has a little bit lower display pixels density, it also counts with a way larger display and a much better 1892 x 2688 resolution.
Honor 20 Pro counts with a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features a little bit better processing power than Honor 20 Pro. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and 8 GB of RAM memory.
Honor 20 Pro features a superior camera than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Honor 20 Pro also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better images and videos in poorly lited environments and a much higher 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has just a little bit longer battery performance than Honor 20 Pro, because it has a 4449mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.