Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-21 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than the Honor 20 Pro, getting a global score of 87.1 against 73.2. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra body is extremely newer, but a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier than Honor 20 Pro. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better screen than Honor 20 Pro, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite bigger display.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much greater storage for games and applications than Honor 20 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Honor 20 Pro has a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has just a little better battery duration than Honor 20 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a bit better camera than Honor 20 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for shooting images and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with better video frame rate, a better resolution camera in the back and a way bigger camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.