Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-05-21 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z Force is just a bit better than the Honor 20 Pro, with a score of 75.8 against 73.2. Despite of the fact that the Motorola Moto Z Force is extremely older than Honor 20 Pro, it's construction is lighter and somewhat thinner. The Honor 20 Pro has a little faster processing unit than Moto Z Force, because it has more CPU cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
Moto Z Force has a little bit better screen than Honor 20 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. The Honor 20 Pro takes better pictures and videos than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Honor 20 Pro also has a lot higher 48 MP resolution camera in the back and a way larger camera aperture to take better low-light images.
Moto Z Force counts with a greater storage for games and applications than Honor 20 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Honor 20 Pro features a bit longer battery duration than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.