Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2019-05-21 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto Z2 Play has an overall score of 77.4, which is just a bit better than the Honor 20 Pro's score of 73.2. Moto Z2 Play's design is extremely thinner and extremely lighter than Honor 20 Pro, even though it was released around 23 months before. Honor 20 Pro has a bit better CPU than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor 20 Pro also has more RAM memory.
Honor 20 Pro has a slightly better screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a bit greater display pixels density, a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little larger screen. The Moto Z2 Play counts with a greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Honor 20 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Honor 20 Pro counts with superior battery duration than Moto Z2 Play, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Honor 20 Pro shoots much clearer videos and photos than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Honor 20 Pro also has a larger aperture for better low-light photos and video and a back camera with lot more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.