Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-05-21 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black and Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto Z3 is just a bit better than Honor 20 Pro, getting a overall score of 77.6 against 73.2. Moto Z3 is an older phone than the Honor 20 Pro, but Motorola could make it lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. The Honor 20 Pro features a little faster CPU than Moto Z3, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Honor 20 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Honor 20 Pro has a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a bit larger display, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen. Moto Z3 counts with a bigger memory to install applications and games than Honor 20 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Honor 20 Pro features a greater camera than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Honor 20 Pro also has a way bigger back camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photographs, a lot larger aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited environments and a way more mega pixels back facing camera.
The Honor 20 Pro has superior battery duration than Moto Z3, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.