Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| 2019-05-21 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia 9 PureView is a bit better than the Honor 20 Pro, having a general score of 76.4 against 73.2. Although Nokia 9 PureView and Honor 20 Pro were only released with a couple of months difference, Nokia 9 PureView is a little lighter and just a little thinner. Nokia 9 PureView counts with a slightly better looking screen than Honor 20 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 resolution and more pixels per screen inch.
The Nokia 9 PureView features a little better performance than Honor 20 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Honor 20 Pro has a way better camera than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Honor 20 Pro also has a much larger back camera sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality, a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a way bigger aperture for better low light captures and videos.
Honor 20 Pro has a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Honor 20 Pro has improved battery duration than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3320mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.