Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-21 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a general score of 75.8, which is just a bit better than the Honor 20 Pro's general score of 73.2. Even being the best we are comparing, the nubia Red Magic 3S construction is heavier and somewhat thicker than the Honor 20 Pro. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a little bit better hardware performance than Honor 20 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM memory.
Honor 20 Pro has a little more vivid screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Honor 20 Pro also counts with a just a little higher amount of pixels in each inch in the display. Nubia Red Magic 3S's memory for apps and games is very similar to Honor 20 Pro's one, both of them have equal 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has longer battery performance than Honor 20 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The nubia Red Magic 3S takes clearer photographs and videos than Honor 20 Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for shooting photographs and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same camera sensor size and a 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera, the nubia Red Magic 3S also counts with a much higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.