Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-21 | 2019-10-05 |
| 6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue, Green and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 409 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.54 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A20s is slightly better than the Honor 20 Pro, with a score of 77 against 73.2. The Galaxy A20s body is just a bit heavier but a little bit thinner than Honor 20 Pro, and both were released with only 5 months difference. The Honor 20 Pro has a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a way greater pixel density.
The Honor 20 Pro features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A20s, and although they both have 8 cores, the Honor 20 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. Honor 20 Pro counts with a greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy A20s's battery lifetime is just as good as the battery life in Honor 20 Pro. Honor 20 Pro shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy A20s, because it has a much higher resolution back camera, a much higher 3840x2160 video definition, a way larger aperture and a way bigger camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.