Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-05-21 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A22 is just a bit better than Honor 20 Pro, with a 76.1 score against 73.2. Galaxy A22 is a just a bit heavier phone than the Honor 20 Pro, but they are equally thin. Honor 20 Pro features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Honor 20 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM.
Honor 20 Pro counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and more pixels per display inch. Honor 20 Pro counts with a little bit better storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Honor 20 Pro takes way better videos and photos than Galaxy A22, and although they both have a back facing camera with a 48 MP resolution, the Honor 20 Pro also has a lot better (4K) video resolution and a lot larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photos and videos. The Honor 20 Pro has a really longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.