Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-21 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a general score of 84.6, which is much better than Honor 20 Pro's 73.2 global score. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G design is much newer, but heavier and a little thicker than the Honor 20 Pro. The Honor 20 Pro counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bit better pixel density.
Honor 20 Pro counts with a little bit better storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Honor 20 Pro counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Honor 20 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G counts with longer battery life than Honor 20 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Honor 20 Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have a 48 MP camera in the back, the Honor 20 Pro also has a much larger camera aperture and a much better 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.