Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-21 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black and Blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G is a little bit better than the Honor 20 Pro, getting a global score of 79.4 against 73.2. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G body is noticeably newer and a bit thinner, but somewhat heavier than Honor 20 Pro. The Honor 20 Pro has a much more powerful processor than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor 20 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A35 5G has just a bit better screen than Honor 20 Pro, because although it has a bit lower amount of pixels per screen inch, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340px resolution, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a quite larger screen. Honor 20 Pro has a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because it has 128 GB more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has improved battery performance than Honor 20 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh. Honor 20 Pro counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video definition, a back facing camera with less mega pixels resolution and a tinier sensor capturing worse quality photographs, it also counts with a lot larger aperture to take better low-light photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.