Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2019-05-21 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is much better than Honor 20 Pro's overall score of 73.2. Even though Galaxy A50 and Honor 20 Pro were released only 2 months apart, Galaxy A50 is just a little bit lighter and a bit thinner. The Honor 20 Pro counts with just a bit better screen than Galaxy A50, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340px resolution, the Honor 20 Pro also counts with a little bit greater display pixel density.
Honor 20 Pro has just a little better processing power than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Honor 20 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM. Galaxy A50 counts with just a bit bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Honor 20 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A50's battery performance is very similar to the battery performance in Honor 20 Pro. Honor 20 Pro takes better pictures and videos than Galaxy A50, because it has a back facing camera with a much better resolution, a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a lot bigger sensor taking lot higher quality photographs and videos and a larger aperture for better low light captures and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.