Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-21 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 has an overall score of 85.5, which is better than Honor 20 Pro's overall score of 73.2. The Samsung Galaxy A51 is a a little thinner and just a bit lighter phone than the Honor 20 Pro, even though both were only released with a couple months difference. The Honor 20 Pro features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A51, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater amount of pixels per screen inch.
The Honor 20 Pro counts with a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Honor 20 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A51 counts with slightly more memory to install applications and games than Honor 20 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A51's battery life is very similar to the battery life in Honor 20 Pro. Honor 20 Pro takes a little bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video definition, the same resolution camera in the back and a 0.5 inches sensor, the Honor 20 Pro also has a way larger aperture to take better captures and videos in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.