Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2019-05-21 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and Blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is a lot better than the Honor 20 Pro, with a 90.7 score against 73.2. The Samsung Galaxy A52 is a a little heavier device than Honor 20 Pro, but both are 0.33inches thick. The Honor 20 Pro has a little sharper display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bit higher amount of pixels in each inch of screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has more storage capacity to install games and applications than Honor 20 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1 TB. The Honor 20 Pro features just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Honor 20 Pro also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a little bit better camera than Honor 20 Pro, because although it has a much smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a bigger camera sensor taking better quality photographs and videos and a much more MP camera in the back.
The Galaxy A52 counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Honor 20 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.