Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-05-21 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and Blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G has an overall score of 91.3, which is much better than the Honor 20 Pro's 73.2 global score. The Galaxy A52 5G is a a little bit heavier cellphone than Honor 20 Pro, but both are 0.33inches thick. Honor 20 Pro features a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher number of pixels per inch of display.
The Honor 20 Pro features a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Honor 20 Pro also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Honor 20 Pro, because although it has a much tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for taking pictures or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a lot higher resolution camera and a bigger sensor which provides a better image and video quality.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Honor 20 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a little longer battery life than Honor 20 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.