Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-21 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 is much better than the Honor 20 Pro, having an 88.1 score against 73.2. The Samsung Galaxy F62 body is newer, but somewhat thicker and heavier than Honor 20 Pro. Galaxy F62 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Honor 20 Pro, because although it has a bit inferior pixels amount in each inch of screen, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit bigger display.
The Galaxy F62 has a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Honor 20 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Honor 20 Pro has a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has a higher number of cores and more RAM memory.
Galaxy F62 features a really longer battery performance than Honor 20 Pro, because it has a 7000mAh battery size. Galaxy F62 has a bit better camera than Honor 20 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light photography and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a camera in the back with a much better resolution and a larger back camera sensor providing a better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.