Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-05-21 | 2019-03-07 |
| 6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M30 is better than the Honor 20 Pro, having an 82.4 score against 73.2. The Galaxy M30 is a just a little lighter phone than the Honor 20 Pro, but both of them have the same thickness. Honor 20 Pro counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy M30, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Honor 20 Pro also has more RAM.
Honor 20 Pro counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy M30, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater display pixel density and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340px. Galaxy M30 has a bit more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Honor 20 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy M30 features longer battery performance than Honor 20 Pro, because it has a 25% greater battery capacity. Honor 20 Pro takes much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy M30, because it has a way bigger camera sensor providing a much better image quality, a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels, a much larger aperture and a lot better (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.