Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2019-05-21 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a general score of 80.4, which is just a bit better than Honor 20 Pro's overall score of 73.2. Despite of the fact that Galaxy Note Fan Edition is older than Honor 20 Pro, it's body is just a little lighter and just a little thinner. Galaxy Note Fan Edition has just a bit better screen than Honor 20 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Honor 20 Pro counts with a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Honor 20 Pro also has more RAM. Honor 20 Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Honor 20 Pro also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality videos and pictures, a larger diafragm aperture to take better images and videos in low light environments and a back camera with much more mega pixels.
The Honor 20 Pro features a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Honor 20 Pro features longer battery performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 25% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.