Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-05-21 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is much better than the Honor 20 Pro, getting a global score of 93.4 against 73.2. The Galaxy S22 design is a lot newer, just a little thinner and a little lighter than Honor 20 Pro. The Honor 20 Pro counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy S22. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and 8 GB of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a more vivid display than Honor 20 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also counts with a quite higher screen pixel density. Honor 20 Pro features a much bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy S22, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy S22 has a little bit better camera than Honor 20 Pro, because although it has a way tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a much higher video resolution, a back-facing camera with a better 50 megapixels resolution and a lot larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Honor 20 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy S22, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.