Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-05-21 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is way better than Honor 20 Pro, having a 95.4 score against 73.2. Galaxy S22 Ultra is a newer cellphone than the Honor 20 Pro, although it's just a little bit thicker and incredibly heavier. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a lot better display than Honor 20 Pro, because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen, a quite bigger display and a higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution.
The Honor 20 Pro counts with just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra. They have the same number of cores and 8 GB of RAM memory. The Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots better photos and videos than Honor 20 Pro, because although it has a much smaller aperture, it also counts with a way larger sensor providing a much higher image quality, a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot higher resolution back facing camera.
Honor 20 Pro has a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. Galaxy S22 Ultra has greater battery lifetime than Honor 20 Pro, because it has a 25 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.