Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-21 | -- |
| 6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 6.42 ounces | -- |
| Black and Blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has an overall score of 90.7, which is a lot better than the Honor 20 Pro's overall score of 73.2. Galaxy S25 Ultra is a incredibly thinner and notably lighter cellphone than Honor 20 Pro. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better looking screen than Honor 20 Pro, because it has a bit better display density, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a little bit bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's storage to store more apps and games is very similar to Honor 20 Pro's one, both of them have equal 256 GB internal storage capacity. Honor 20 Pro counts with a really superior processing power than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra features improved battery performance than Honor 20 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a way better camera than Honor 20 Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking photographs and/or video in low light environments, it also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photos, a way better video quality and a camera with a much better 200 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.