Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2019-05-21 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.54 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 Active has an overall score of 75.8, which is a little bit better than Honor 20 Pro's general score of 73.2. The Galaxy S7 Active is a way older, somewhat thicker and a bit heavier device than the Honor 20 Pro. The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a sharper display than Honor 20 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel amount in each inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Honor 20 Pro features much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Honor 20 Pro has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4 GB more RAM memory and more cores.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's battery performance is just as good as Honor 20 Pro's battery life. Honor 20 Pro counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Honor 20 Pro also has a back facing camera with much more MP and a larger diafragm aperture for better low light photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.