Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-05-21 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 409 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a general score of 80.1, which is a little bit better than Honor 20 Pro's general score of 73.2. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a newer phone than Honor 20 Pro, but it is way thicker and way heavier. Honor 20 Pro counts with a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Honor 20 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little bit better looking screen than Honor 20 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher number of pixels per screen inch. The Honor 20 Pro features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a larger aperture, a much larger sensor shooting much better quality videos and photographs, a much better video definition and a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Honor 20 Pro features a bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a little better battery life than Honor 20 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.