Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-21 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is better than Honor 20 Pro, having a general score of 81 against 73.2. Although the Galaxy XCover Pro is better than Honor 20 Pro, we must highlight that it is also a somewhat thicker and heavier phone. Honor 20 Pro has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro. Both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a same size display and a better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen.
Honor 20 Pro features a bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Honor 20 Pro counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Honor 20 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy XCover Pro has just a little better battery duration than Honor 20 Pro, because it has a 4050mAh battery size against 4000mAh. The Honor 20 Pro has a superior camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a way bigger sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality, a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a camera in the back with a lot higher 48 MP resolution and a bigger aperture to capture better photography and video in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.